IIMs have been in the news for decades now. They are spoken of as the best management schools in the country, CEO factories (50% of the CEOs of the top 200 companies in India are IIM alumni), recruiters' suppliers for future business leaders, tools for producing cash-generating machines and much more!
The questions is, "What sets them apart?". Many believe it is possible to replicate the curriculum, case studies, study material and even the rigour being offered at the IIMs. They think it's even possible to build institutes with much better infrastructure then the IIMs have (after all, that takes nothing more than big money!). A few feel its even possible to bring in Faculty from these institutes. There have been instances where professors from IIMs have taken up roles of Directors at other private institutes. So, all-in-all, a lot of private institutions these days have been trying to ape the success of the IIMs. What is it then, that still helps these institutes stand apart? To answer this one needs to look at the admission process of these institutes.
As most people would know, admission to the IIMs takes place through a 2 step process:
1) CAT - An entrance exam taken by more than 250,000 candidates annually
2) Out of these 3,500 to 4,000 candidates are invited for round 2 - the GD-PI round after which the fortunate 1,500 make it to these coveted institutes.
This calls for a comparison:
1,500 students out of the 250,000 applicants get admission offers from the IIMs ( Top 0.6 %)
We compare this to Harvard, supposedly the best B-school in the world, which requires a candidate to be among the top 10-12% of the applicants to receive an admission offer.
Top 0.6% vs Top 10-12%....Sometimes numbers do speak louder than words!!!
This, I believe, is where the IIMs have outscored their peers. For years, after their inception the IIMs have continued to throw up talented individuals who went on to become influential and successful managers, bringing glory and fame to their alma mater, which in turn attracted better talent year after year. The good work of the alumni added value and credibility to the IIMs and over the years built the now worshipped 'Brand IIM'. In return year after year, the talent entering the IIMs continued to gain knowledge, exposure and more importantly 'value' from these esteemed institutions, thereby making it a mutually beneficial relationship between this talent pool and their alma mater. This is where the IIMs have taken a big lead compared to their counterparts. The best students in the country being a part of these institutes has been the single most important source of competitive advantage for the IIMs. And it is this which the wannabes are finding it extremely difficult to ape. Where, and how, do they get students of the calibre like those of the IIMs? They can't.
We are now just 3 days away from a historic day in the history of one of the IIMs. IIM Lucknow, the 4th to come into existence after Calcutta, Ahmedabad and Bangalore (in that order), will celebrate its completion of 25 years on July 26th, 2009. For us, the alumni of IIM Lucknow, it is a proud moment to be associated with such a great institute which we fondly call hel(L) - thanks to the rigorous curriculum we went through during our two year stay there. On this day, I would like to congratulate every single member of the IIM Lucknow family - the students, the faculty, the alumni, the administrative staff, the workers, the wage earners and every single person who has been associated with my alma mater anytime over the last 25 years. It is indeed a proud moment for all of us.
This blog, titled: "Stars in hel(L)", as one might think is NOT an attempt to highlight highly successful, super rich, star achievers of IIM Lucknow. We already have enough coverage on them (For more info about the star alumni, refer to "ACHIEVERS", a monthly interview series highlighting the most successful alumni of the institute. For further details contact alumni@iiml.ac.in ).
Then, what is this blog about? Well, this blog is about people. The people, I came across during my two years in hel(L). It does not matter what they go on to become in life, their attidude, their personality, their traits, the passion with which they lived their 2 years in hel(L), makes them my stars. These are the kind of personalities, I had come across for the first time in my life, in hel(L), and its extremely unlikely that I may come across similar people in future. They have been the most loved, and the most hated people in hel(L).
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Top 0.6% vs Top 10-12%....Sometimes numbers do speak louder than words!!!"
ReplyDeleteI don't agree with the interpretation here...
This may sound clichéd and as much consultant-speak as it can be, but this is not 'Apples to Apples' comparison. Lot of people (I can hazard a guess of at least 2 lakhs) writing the CAT know they have absolutely no chance of making it to the IIMs. On the other hand, the people who apply to Harvard usually believe truly that they have a chance. The cost of application and the fact that you can only ever apply twice in your life makes all the difference. This is the same case with other B-schools too. I am of course not saying that IIMs don't attract the best of people, but let us not get carried away by misinterpreting the numbers. :)
Also, I don't like people calling IIM Lucknow hel(L)... it deserves a much better name....
Anyway, nice blog...
Well Melkor, I would like to disagree a bit on your reasoning. I do agree about your reasoning but then just see the amount of pressure that Indian students face in the process, the state of development etc.
ReplyDeleteAnd about we calling IIM Lucknow hel(L) you got to be here to get a feel !!
I would still hold on to my existing belief, given the human element involved in what can be termed as extremenly important in forming the image of an institute- its placements.
ReplyDeleteI think placements are governed to a very large extent by the strength of the alumni (in terms of numbers, positions etc) in the industry. So, the older an institution, the more penetration of alumni it is likely to have, and the greater tendency of companies to visit these institutes back (understandably, a decision making person is likely to have a bias towards his own institute). And I think this is what screws up the me-too institutes.
to me IIMs are just the biggest fiefdoms in their area. the institutes have become so exotic/esoteric in themselves that not being in them drives up their value. a comparable instance is that of IAS cadre or being the son of a filmstar. it isn't what you do, but how you can easily scramble to the top. it saddens me that the only real work is done by old professors who work with the have-nots (say, a govt department wanting to become relevant to society), why doesn't the iim system enable/encourage the brightest minds in the world to do stuff which is bigger than slogging your way selling soaps or writing analyst reports 24X7?
ReplyDeleteThe stat that 50% of top CEOs are from here is even more intriguing. why have iim students of old never thought to go anywhere else? if they did, wouldn't the IIMs be better off?
in the end, everything except academics is guided by placements. it is the wrong motto to be guided by. skews lives. the process of making the manager is incidental to the misguided thought-processes we have here. processes are good, but whether they should exist at all is never questioned.
i restrain myself from damning my alma-mater more than this, maybe i am an idealist, maybe i am reckless, maybe i am a fool......either way, globe maarna to seekh hi gaya hu.
@bal mukund: Dude... I have been there... :) and I still don't like it being called hel(L)... sounds slightly moronic to me, that's all.
ReplyDeleteAlso, what makes you think only Indian students are under pressure. A typical American has to pay a lot lot more for an MBA degree and therefore is saving up for it for 3-5 years before he/she actually joins a school like Harvard. Its a different kind of pressure and only those who REALLY REALLY think they have a GREAT chance (and that after talking to alumni, faculty and others) ACTUALLY apply... and then there is a 1 in 10 chance of making it (and that too only 2 times in your life) Comparison with top B-schools is all nice to talk about, but we better know what we are talking about or else we just end up being wannabes...
and now: like Ignoramus I too don't want to damn my alma-mater, so let me say this: IIMs have their strengths: the teaching is a lot more technical, the students may not be "better" but they usually are sharper. Its only when we get carried away by statistics and a weird kind of jingoism that it hurts us.
Melkor - gud to know that you had been here .. and yes it's personal - liking or not liking the name hel(L) .. I am a believer of traditions and culture .. so what if hel(L) sounds moronic .. it's something that you would be known for in the IIM alma mater (all the IIMs, and not only IIM L).. and I see this as something unique to our institute ... though one would like it to be known for a lot other better stuffs ! Your views must have come from a lot of research and mine from my heart.. and I know that one should back one's views and opinions with facts and figures (bare minimum expected from an MBA) but still i would like to speak my heart out from what i have seen.. what i have experienced which cannot be quantified ...
ReplyDelete